Irreversible Repetitions: The Armadillo in the Face of the Anthropocene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33324/daya.vi20.1177Keywords:
armadillo, body, heritage, territory, visual arts, critical perspectiveAbstract
This reflective article focuses on the armadillo, an endemic species of South America, as a symbolic figure and a situated body from which to explore the tensions between body, territory, memory, and heritage in the context of the Anthropocene. Based on the artistic project Anthropocene, Irreversible Repetitions (2019), the text proposes a critical reflection on the repeated violence humanity inflicts on other forms of life, as well as on the contradictions that emerge between the conservation of natural heritage and the transmission of cultural traditions. The methodology is grounded in a critical and relational approach to the project, developed through research-creation methodology, understood as an inseparable process linking thought, artistic practice, and situated experience. This approach combines dialogue among artistic, scientific, and philosophical epistemologies, along with a critical reflection aimed at denaturalizing anthropocentric hierarchies and extractivist logics that have historically shaped relationships between the human and the non-human. Within a theoretical framework connected to art, Latin American environmental history, and relational and decolonial ontologies, the project brings together photography of bodily interventions, video art, experimental printmaking with organic materials, and sculptures of armadillos in metal and textile. These practices activate a visual and poetic narrative that intertwines memory, matter, and affect, addressing notions of fragility, vulnerability, resistance, and care. The armadillo thus emerges as a contradiction between natural and cultural heritage, as a symbolic threshold that enables a critical interrogation of how we inhabit the world, and opens possibilities for imagining more sensitive, just, and regenerative modes of coexistence among species.
Keywords: armadillo, body, heritage, territory, visual arts, critical perspective.
Downloads
References
Albelda, J. & Saborit, J. (1997). La construcción de la naturaleza. Generalitat Valenciana.
Borgdorff, H. (2012). The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_595042
Bourriaud, N. (2008). Estética relacional. Adriana Hidalgo Editora.
Brondízio, E. S. (1997). Rural livelihoods and forest resource use in the Amazon. Human Ecology.
Caballero, B. (2014). Prácticas artísticas ecológicas: Un estado de la cuestión. Arte y Políticas de Identidad, 10, 11–34. http://revistas.um.es/api/article/view/219151
De Sousa Santos, B. (2015). Una epistemología del Sur. Editorial Siglo XXI.
Emmons, L. H. & Feer, F. (1997). Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Escobar, A. (2019). Pluriverso: Un diccionario del posdesarrollo. Icaria Editorial.
Gallardo K., L. (2017). Antropoceno en Chile y oportunidades para un desarrollo sostenible y resiliente. Centro de Ciencia del Clima y la Resiliencia. https://www.cr2.cl/antropoceno-en-chile-y-oportunidades-para-un-desarrollo-sostenible-y-resiliente/
Grebe, M. E. (1989–1990). El culto a los animales sagrados emblemáticos en la cultura aymara de Chile. Revista Chilena de Antropología, (8), 35–51.
Haraway, D. (2019). Seguir con el problema. Generar parentesco con el Chthuluceno. Ediciones Consonni.
Hobbs, R. (2024, 19 de enero). Musical armadillos and changing charangos. The Nature of Music. https://www-the--nature--of--music-com.translate.goog/2024/01/19/musical-armadillos-and-changing-charangos/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=es&_x_tr_pto=tc
Instrumento Inusual. (s.f.). El charango de armadillo: Conservación y controversia. Diccionario de Instrumentos Musicales. https://instrumentoinusual.net/instrumentos-tradicionales/charango-armadillo-conservacion-controversia/
Ladera Sur. (2019). Armadillos de Chile: Guía práctica para su identificación. https://laderasur.com/articulo/armadillos-de-chile-guia-practica-para-su-identificacion/?srsltid=AfmBOoo2ANJbDBZglaQru-b0qTFYV_M7eWyFY-Ezbfc-1ATvvf_2Fpbgl
Latour, B. (2017). Cara a cara con Gaia: Ocho conferencias sobre el nuevo régimen climático. Siglo XXI Editores.
Mendívil, J. (2002). La construcción de la historia: El charango en la memoria colectiva mestiza ayacuchana. Revista Musical Chilena, 56(198), 63–78. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0716-27902002019800004&script=sci_arttext DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-27902002019800004
Novo, M. (2002). Ciencia, arte y medioambiente. Ecoarte. Grupo Mundi-Prensa.
Pasutti, R., Ponce, A. & Dufflocq, P. (2020). Indigenous knowledge and use of the locally threatened Andean hairy armadillo (Chaetophractus vellerosus). I Congresso Internacional de Conservação de Xenarthra. November 30th – December 3rd, Online.
Peredo, B. (1999). Bolivia’s trade in hairy armadillos. TRAFFIC Bulletin, 18(1), 41–45.
Raquejo, T. & Parreño, J. M. (2015). Arte y ecología. UNED.
Riechmann, J. (2022). Simbioética. Homo sapiens en el entramado de la vida. Plaza y Valdés Editores.
Robinson, J. G. & Redford, K. H. (1994). Measuring the sustainability of hunting in tropical forests. Oryx, 28(4), 249–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300028647
Tafalla, M. (2022). Filosofía ante la crisis ecológica. Plaza y Valdés Editores.
Zarrilli, A. (2016). Por una historia ambiental latinoamericana. Teseo.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 info:eu-repo/semantic/openAccess

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




